Valuing Trust Joy, & Organising Human Systems - Starting to Know The World's Biggest Conflict Stories

07-Jun-03

Take the 10-slide tour: 1 2 3

Research shows that in service, knowledge and globally networked markets, businesses can only systematically sustain growth over time if they promote trust and joy of focus. These two human capital flows impact far more value over time than financial capital alone can, but most critically of all: financial metrics of performance are now provable to be the worst possible maths for cultivating these relationship drivers. Specifically transactional accounting, ruling in the absence of transparency measures, is the perfect maths for compounding conflicts between stakeholders over time.
Sildes:

Parts of following are under construction
4 joy of focus, self-organising knowledge workers,

Tangible accounting’s primary assumption of numerical precision is based on separability, whereas relationship value is primarily interacted by connectivity. The risks of over-control by old numbers increase as environments change rapidly or as people under high and separate pressures to perform hide errors or fail to share the most crucial question on which behavioural learning depends in healthy human systems. Our databank reveals over 100 cases of organisational meltdowns in the last 3 years ranging from NASA’s safety-conflicted culture to Andersen’s socially-devaluing one to National power-grids that are too brittle to network to retailers who turn their suppliers against them to dotcoms that needed far more communal partnering capabilities. 5 meltdown slide

Trust is needed at interpersonal levels of networking such as sharing knowledge or making investment decisions that are strategically robust because they have connected enough people in adaptability as well as uniquely grounded competences. Joy of focus is needed to make the most of any expert, and probably of any human being whose innovation or commitment you care to have serving the organisation. 6 networking 7 open space

Openly cataloguing the system methods that restore and sustain trust and joy is amongst the most exciting human work that organisational designers, facilitators, mentors and people who value human society can do. We invite you to join in this open source initiative classifying methods by the 10 greatest value multipliers that human system mappers use to ensure that the value dynamics of people relationships is communally purposeful over time and architected to ensure that no destructive conflicts compound at the interfaces between systems or networks.
8 catalogue 9 10 10 billion dollar audit

EI's Meta-Practitioner Newsletter (subscribe or debate shared mentoring needs) is co-sponsoring the worldwide goal to open-publish a pdf library of extraordinary knowledge leadership cases on organisational risk and lost transparency of human systems. These are stories full of human interest and future conflict.

For the purposes of illustrating cases we seek, we debate how the Netherland's greatest retailer has come to the point of financial destruction. What cases could we write up together? And where could we open-source their most valuable learnings so that human beings - and their democratic policies – bring transparency to the dynamics of leadership sustainability in a networked world??

Details

Attachments: 3

  • Microsoft Word
    Five Ignorances of Organisational Design systematically explain how leaders can lose all trust and value. Conversely, it is entirely possible to audit hi-trust organisations but different governing knowledge needs to be opened up to structure the human dynamics of 10-win value multiplication.
    17-Oct-03
  • Microsoft Word
    retailrisk (113 Kb)
    Conversation about the biggest conflicts world class retailer leaders can risk taking with everyone's trust
    07-Oct-03
  • GIF Image File
    valuedemands (17 Kb)
    In a networked world, stakeholders value you multiplicatively V1*V2*V3*V4*V5. This means that if your system compounds such distrust as to be worthless with any one of the 5 stakeholder branches pictured, then your organisation will compound distrust over time until it is wholly devalued.
    28-Oct-03
Author:
Chris Macrae
Publisher:
KnowledgeBoard
Date:
07-Jun-03
Categories:
Emotional Intelligence, Knowledge Angels 
Sections:

This article has been read 5043 times.

Member comments (3)

Share your views with other users: add your own comments to this item.

Chris Macrae
Chris Macrae, 21-Aug-04 @ 07:01AM
how the whole of Britain's pensions/financial service sector went wrong

It is now a matter of public record what an extraordinary wrong turning Britain's pensions industries took - see http://www.tomorrowscompany.com

I am wondering whether any other European Countries have been brave enough to admit whole sectprs have been spinning viciously less productively:

railways , national health care, public sector tv, aid to those in global poverty are 4 more of many examples that Britains are holding active inquests on

Chris Macrae
Chris Macrae, 06-Nov-03 @ 02:39AM
Have we given up with narrowing global divides?

http://www.valuetrue.com/home/glossary.cfm?letter=b

I'd be interested in joining in the open cataloguing of the 50 biggest humanitarian challenges around the globe, and whom you trust most as doing anything about them

Meanwhile, its hard to believe that conventional wisdom has been doing well enough:

US: http://www.50years.org

US:http://www.actionaidusa.org
US: http://www.bicusa.org

Aus: http://www.aidwatch.org.au
Zim: http://www.afrodad.co.zw

SWI http://www.evb.ch
more at http://www.ifiwatchnet.org/watchers/index.shtml

Chris Macrae
Chris Macrae, 10-Oct-03 @ 20:56PM
examples welcome

Do you have an example of an organisation or industry or public service that took a disastrous wrong turning? Something which no human beings wanted. For example, how well do you think financial service sector is serving future pensioners in your country?

Let's hear about it and see if we can work out in this context where knowledge management first went systemically wrong.